PDA

View Full Version : Sherman stronger then Panzer IV ?



evya135
19th Aug 06, 12:02 PM
I noticed something really disturbing after installing the patch....
first of all, its great, i can now play the game on full graphics and it runs smooth... i can see shadows ffs !
i was so excited i ran through the tutorial again and when i got to the armour tutorial and that guy said "get the sherman behind the panzer bla bla bla"
i saw the panzer shooting my front, and i shot his and the sherman kicked his ass.
I didnt even went to his rear..... this is really weird because the panzer needs to have better armour then the sherman... before the patch in a 1v1 situations without micoring the sherman to the panzers rear you wouldve lose.... but now... sherman > panzer
Its not balanced and not historicly correct (or is it ???)

Firesparks
19th Aug 06, 12:05 PM
I think the tutorial is rigged in the player's favor (naturally)

FatalTheRabbit
19th Aug 06, 12:46 PM
Yes, the tutorial is just to show you how armor works, it's not actually how the units are.

Frosty
19th Aug 06, 1:11 PM
I think the tutorial is rigged in the player's favor (naturally)

Yeah. The engine hit is inevitable, as it is a scripted event. After the engine hit, the Panzer IV will blow up after 2 shots.

In a multiplayer match, the sherman ist actually pretty equal to a Panzer IV.

jayze302
19th Aug 06, 1:16 PM
its all scripted events in the tutorial

Demonic Spoon
19th Aug 06, 3:52 PM
A Sherman A4 (In CoH, it's the sherman with the upgraded cannon) was actually a match for a Panzer IV though.

Skyward
21st Aug 06, 1:50 AM
(1.17)I think the sherman front armour should be toned down and maybe a small prize cut? ATM they are too powerfull with gun upgrade and field repairs + allied war machine.

At least that's my opinion from my experience.

CorsairX
21st Aug 06, 3:04 AM
Skyward, Demonic Spoon i agree with both of you

Demonic Spoon
21st Aug 06, 10:26 AM
Well that's not to say it would beat it outright. By "be a match for" I don't mean "mop the floor with it".

but yeah, before the Sherman A4, Allied armor was piss poor vs axis armor.

MasterToad
21st Aug 06, 10:49 AM
Seriously how many times does this have to be said?

GAMEPLAY > REALISM

For example, Volksgrenadiers weren't even used as normal troops, however Relic had to put in a lowest tier of infantry for game balance. Lord knows how many threads here pop up with crap about realism or nitpicking at the historical accuracy.

Its a game ffs, get over the fact that Shermans dont beat Panzers. There is a reason for that and its gameplay balance.

Demonic Spoon
21st Aug 06, 11:05 AM
GAMEPLAY > REALISM

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/5038/3301603yk2.jpg

It is optimal, however, to have both, and both is usually achievable.

CorsairX
21st Aug 06, 12:04 PM
thats right and it was more difficult with dow and they did it nevertheless -> see dowpro