Alert for?

[Silver_Wolf#]

we have a problem here in my country...
the name of this problem is the oil of "colza" , a vegetable oil.
This oil can be easily found on every market (is also an oil to fry stuff), can be put on your motor (diesel), cost less than 1/3 of the organic oil, and have less dangerous emissions... all this with engines not planned to use this oil...

this oil is already in commerce (so the profit and the tech to justify the production is present), but is an action over the law to put it in your car...
This suggest me some "oil sisters" economic theory... but i would be labeled as "forum official conspiracies officier"-The fizu



Ahh guys i know that used vegetable oil from deep fry devices can be used as gas for diesel cars if filtered, thats about the only trash(its thrown out after its used so trash) to oil i know thats worth while and doesn't require a vast amount of energy to produce.-Silver_Wolf#

Ahh now there is a diference between the posts, i specified that normal vegetable oil from deep far fryers could be used if filtered in diesel cars which is totaly diferent from what Fizu said, his oil would be used in its preused state mine would be used after its commercial useage.Now maybe i should have specified better there "that its the only legal trash to oil i know thats worth while and can be produced by your average joe"(note you only need to filter the oil once for it to work in a diesel) maybe thats where all this stems from and yes i know i should read the thread before posting(guilty :|) but still its debatable who's trash to oil vegetable oil is better.

[Homdax]

I do not see why this is in Forum Issues. Are you suggesting that Delphy should use vegetable oil to cool the forum servers :wtf: ?

[Moe]

It would really help if you would tell us what you're talking about. Are you complaining in FI because of oil?

[Grabnutz]

Alert for?

I think he got a warning for his post, but I'm not sre which of the quotes is his. Somewhere in the "One man's garbage is another man's... oil?" thread

[reki]

I'm not sure everyone understands that providing a link and a legible argument are pre-requisites for having an actual issue that is worthy of posting in this forum.

Anyway.. Silver_Wolf is talking about his post in this thread: http://forums.relicnews.com/showthread.php?p=1684087#post1684087

...and, I assume, StarFisher's advice to him to go and read the thread.

People get warnings for posting in threads that they haven't read and repeating other people's points. You said it yourself:

yes i know i should read the thread before posting(guilty :|)

It's a minor warning, and you're guilty by your own admission. So my advice to you would be to wear it. Attempting to point out subtle variances between your post and the one you're repeating isn't really much of a defense, and certainly trivial enough to contain to a private message if you really have to.

If you really have to discuss it further, then take it up via PM with the moderator who warned you. They will tell you the same thing though: if you can't be bothered to read the thread, then don't be surprised when people get annoyed at you for repeating points. If you're still not satisfied with what the moderator tells you, then they will ask me to re-open this thread for you.

Ta.